The victim is already looking.
Law-firm referrals are a ceiling. Google ads reach victims and counsel searching crypto tracing. LinkedIn ads reach lawyers who refer this work.
Crypto tracing is chain data and an evidentiary bridge. Law-firm referrals keep the lights on and cap the book: the same three firms send the same shape of exploit. The victim who just watched a wallet empty is not waiting on those firms.
They search, or their counsel does. We put the shop in that search. We do not write to wallet holders.
Judgment recovery is a court paper and a debtor. This is a chain and a stolen balance. Judgment recovery lives on high-stakes recovery. Kidnap, maritime, and stolen art stay off this hub.
How these deals actually work
Crypto tracing is chain data and an evidentiary bridge. The victim, or their counsel, just found the exploit or the scam. The first question is whether recovery is even possible. Then they look for who does this work. Chain analytics, exchange touchpoints, mixing, and what will actually stand up for counsel or law enforcement are the file. Law-firm referrals keep the lights on and cap the book: the same three firms send the same shape of exploit. The victim who just watched a wallet empty is not waiting on those firms.
We do not write to wallet holders. We do not sit the claim. Judgment recovery is a court paper and a debtor. This is a chain and a stolen balance. Kidnap, maritime, and stolen art stay off this hub.
What a buyer is actually searching
They type crypto recovery, stolen bitcoin tracing, USDT scam recovery, wallet drain investigator. Today is the exploit or the scam. Last week the funds were in the wallet. The first search is often “is this recoverable,” then a name. Counsel searches the same day when the victim already called them.
Queries from 2017 “I lost bitcoin” stories are a different file, and often not a file. The campaign is for a live drain, not nostalgia.
Lawyers who refer this work are LinkedIn. The victim or counsel with a live exploit is Google.
Objections we hear
It’s gone. Sometimes it is. The first honest conversation is recoverability. A shop that promises every wallet back will not survive the first sophisticated counsel call.
Law enforcement will recover it. Sometimes they will. The victim searching is not willing to wait on that as the only plan.
Our law firm will handle it. Many firms send this out. The ones who already have a tracing shop are not the ones searching.
Who this is actually for
Shops that actually trace and support recovery, with an evidentiary standard counsel can use. The lead worth the spend is a specific exploit or scam, recent enough to chase. A general “I think I got hacked in 2018” is usually not that lead.
This page is a poor fit for a shop that wants to write to wallet holders. That is outbound, and it is not this campaign.
Peel chains, mixers, and exchange deposit addresses are the mechanics of whether a freeze letter or a counsel package has anywhere to go. Recoverability is the first honest hour. A shop that skips it will waste the victim’s time and the counsel’s. Exchange KYC and law-enforcement referrals are sometimes part of the path and never a guarantee. We do not write to wallet holders. We do not claim a recovery rate.
A live drain from this month is a file. A story from 2017 about a forgotten password is usually not. Counsel who already have a tracing shop will not search. Counsel who just got the call, and the victim who has not found counsel yet, will. Those are the two Google intents. LinkedIn is the lawyer who sends this work when they already know it is a tracing file.
Counsel needs something they can exhibit. A screenshot of a tracker is not that. The evidentiary bridge is the product: what was taken, where it went, what can be frozen or demanded, and what cannot. Victims want the money back. Counsel wants a file that survives. A page that only promises “we find wallets” will attract the first and lose the second, and the second is who refers.
If you cannot produce a package counsel will use, you are a dashboard, not a tracing shop. The victim may not know that. Their lawyer will. Build the page for the lawyer even when the victim is the one who types.
Ready to grow your pipeline?
Share a few details and we'll follow up with exactly how this works for a firm like yours.
How the campaign runs
Google ads for victims and counsel searching crypto recovery or tracing, not one generic “hack recovery” campaign. Keywords are always custom to the work you do. Brand bidding and competitor-brand bidding only when the strategy calls for it. Details: paid search.
Foundational work in parallel: the website, local directories, and general search appearance, so the click lands on the shop and not a mill. A landing page may be included; a full website is quoted separately. Directories and bios: online profile development.
LinkedIn ads aimed at lawyers who refer this work: lunch-and-learns, not a message sequence. Paid ads only. We do not offer LinkedIn message outreach (InMail, connection sequences, or DMs). That is a different channel, we do not run it, and it is not part of this program.
Ads produce inbound while the search is live. Foundation is why the buyer or a referrer trusts the shop enough to call.
Why we're not generalists
Generalist marketing agencies will not take the time to understand how this practice actually wins work. The practice is too specialized, the file count is too small, and the work of understanding it bores them. They want large spend and a lot of traffic to a landing page. We will run a tight campaign for a shop that closes fewer files at a higher value. That is the point of this page.
Most agencies do not understand specialized industries well enough to advertise them honestly. We take the time to learn how the work is sold so the keywords and the page the click lands on match the work you actually take. A complex practice deserves that. A generic landing page does not.
How fast this can run
We can get ads live in under a week. What usually slows that down is approval on your side: the keywords, the spend, the page the click lands on. Directories, bios, and a site a buyer will trust take longer to finish. The website and listings are why the person who clicks trusts you. It is not the same as going live on search.
How this is billed
This is Visibility Program work, not the outbound program. You pay ad spend directly to the platforms (Google and, where we run it, LinkedIn). ROI Wire is billed on a retainer that scales with that spend. That is not a flat project fee, not a percentage of closed files, and not an outbound retainer.
A landing page may be included at no additional cost. A full website build is always quoted and billed separately. Foundational services (copywriting, CRM, multichannel sequences, web design) sit under this track as the credibility layer, not as a correspondence program.
Scope is on the Visibility Program. Search mechanics are on paid search. Surfaces are on online profile development.
What is not included
We do not build a solicitation list of wallet holders. We do not write, mail, or phone victims who did not ask. We do not trace the chain or sit the claim. We make the shop findable. The shop does the work.
This is not judgment recovery. Kidnap, maritime, and stolen art stay off this hub.
Program pages
Visibility Program
The full model: what you pay, what we bill, and who this actually fits.
Paid search
The mechanics behind the click: keywords, spend, and a retainer that scales with it.
Online profile development
What a buyer checks after the click and before the call: directories, bios, and reputation.
An exploit is not a referral lag.
Google ads for the victim and counsel. LinkedIn ads for lawyers who refer this work.
Discuss Our Visibility Program