In-house counsel relationships are a path. The use does not wait for them.
The lawyer who sent the last file is not sitting this one. The rights holder has already seen the use. Google for the buyer. LinkedIn for referring counsel. Not a letter to general counsel.
Law-firm referrals and in-house relationships produce until they are the ceiling. The rights holder has already seen the use. Writing to GCs holding unauthorized-use files is the wrong program for this practice.
What is actually broken
The use is the trigger. The patent owner and the trademark owner search when they have seen it. Adding another in-house relationship does not put you in that search, and mailing general counsel is the wrong ethics conversation. License-contract fights are a different problem page.
How the campaign runs
Google ads for the buyer who has seen the use, patent on one theme; trademark and brand on the other; not one generic “IP lawyer” campaign. Keywords are always custom to the work you actually do. Brand bidding and competitor-brand bidding only when the strategy calls for it. Details: paid search.
Foundational work in parallel: the website, local directories, and general search appearance, so the click is a recovery practice. A landing page may be included; a full website is quoted separately. Directories and bios: online profile development.
LinkedIn ads aimed at referring counsel: CLE and lunch-and-learns for patent and trademark litigators who should not keep the recovery. Paid ads only. We do not offer LinkedIn message outreach (InMail, connection sequences, or DMs). That is a different channel, we do not run it, and it is not part of this program.
Ads produce inbound while the problem is live. Foundation is why the buyer or a referring lawyer trusts the firm enough to call. License-contract fights are a different page; see IP licensing disputes. How this is scoped lives on the Visibility Program.
Why we're not generalists
Generalist marketing agencies will not take the time to understand how this practice actually wins work. The practice is too specialized, the file count is too small, and the work of understanding it bores them. They want large spend and a lot of traffic to a landing page. We will run a tight campaign for a shop that closes fewer files at a higher value. That is the point of this page.
Most agencies do not understand specialized industries well enough to advertise them honestly. We take the time to learn how the work is sold so the keywords and the page the click lands on match the work you actually take. A complex practice deserves that. A generic landing page does not.
Ready to grow your pipeline?
Share a few details and we'll follow up with exactly how this works for a firm like yours.
How fast this can run
We can get ads live in under a week. What usually slows that down is approval on your side: the keywords, the spend, the page the click lands on. Directories, bios, and a site a buyer will trust take longer to finish. The website and listings are why the person who clicks trusts you. It is not the same as going live on search.
Lawyer-to-lawyer, in select circumstances
Direct mail or similar correspondence to referring counsel can be part of the work in select circumstances. It is not a list of GCs holding unauthorized-use files. It is not LinkedIn message outreach. Bar rules still vary; the firm confirms what it can run.
How this is billed
This is Visibility Program work, not the outbound program. You pay ad spend directly to the platforms (Google and, where we run it, LinkedIn). ROI Wire is billed on a retainer that scales with that spend. That is not a flat project fee, not a percentage of closed files, and not an outbound retainer.
A landing page may be included at no additional cost. A full website build is always quoted and billed separately. Foundational services (copywriting, CRM, multichannel sequences, web design) sit under this track as the credibility layer, not as a correspondence program.
Scope is on the Visibility Program. Search mechanics are on paid search. Surfaces are on online profile development.
What is not included
We do not build a list of rights holders. We do not write, mail, or phone GCs, product managers, or IP directors who did not ask. We do not sit the infringement action or recover the claim. License-contract fights are a different problem page. Judgment and cargo stay outbound. They are not this problem.
Program pages
Visibility Program
The full model: what you pay, what we bill, and who this actually fits.
Paid search
The mechanics behind the click: keywords, spend, and a retainer that scales with it.
Online profile development
What a buyer checks after the click and before the call: directories, bios, and reputation.
Industry counterpart: IP infringement.
Unauthorized use is not a leftover referral.
Google for the rights holder. CLE and lunch-and-learns for referring counsel. Distinct from license-contract fights.
Discuss Our Visibility Program